Have you ever wanted to be your OWN boss?

Banner

"We made well over $10,000 in 90 days."

Would you like to find out how you can make good money on the side, or as a primary business?

You can do it today! Stop being a slave to the grind, become wealthy instead.


CLICK HERE TO
FIND OUT HOW



Designed by:
SiteGround web hosting Joomla Templates
All 9/11 Airports Serviced by One Israeli Owned Company PDF Print E-mail
Written by The Truth is Out There   
Friday, 30 May 2008 09:21

2Editor: The saga continues

Source

It's one of those times when an innocuous comment in an unrelated news report triggers a revelation.

In the article at http://afrocubaweb.com/news/israelispying.htm there is the following paragraph:

"To make the situation worse, a private security company called ICTS, owned by an Israeli, Ezra Harel, and registered in the Netherlands, was employed at Charles de Gaulle airport to screen passengers boarding US planes. Most of its personnel are ex-Shin Bet officers. The company covers security at Boston's Logan airport, where the American Airlines plane came down after flight attendants and passengers overpowered Reid."

The point of the article was that ICTS knew shoe bomber Richard Reid was dangerous, but allowed him on board a flight from Tel Aviv to Paris. Maybe they did and maybe they didn't. But the idea that an Israeli owned company had inside access to the airport used to launch an abortive terror attack brought to mind the strange message Odigo Systems, another Israeli owned company with offices near the World Trade Towers, received that warned of the impending attacks before the hijacked planes had even left the ground.

So, I went back to another story that had surfaced briefly, reported at www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26626 about how at least one hijacker had smuggled a GUN aboard one of the hijacked planes. Even prior to 9-11, getting a gun on board a passenger plane represented a serious lapse of security. I wondered why this story of a gun was being concealed behind talk of box cutters and screwdrivers.

Then I went back to the first article and its mention that ICTS handled security at Logan International Airport, from which two of the 9-11 hijacked planes had departed.

Sure enough, a visit to ICTS' own web site at http://www.icts-int.com/ confirms that ICTS is in fact an Israeli owned company, and that it sells services to every airport from which the hijacked planes operated, including security, sometimes through wholly owned subsidiaries like Huntleigh USA Corporation.

It has been suggested that the incredible feat of hijacking four aircraft without a single arrest at the gate would require the resources of a nation-state. This is even more true with the revelation that at least one gun had managed to be aboard a hijacked plane. One company had automatic inside access to all of the airports from which hijacked planes departed on 9-11, and to the airports used by Richard Reid, the shoe bomber. An Israeli company. One that Mossad agents could easily find employment with without the management knowing who they were or what their purpose really was.

But one thing is clear. By virtue of the Odigo warning, someone knew enough about the planned attacks to warn Odigo before the planes had even departed the airport gates, yet they did not call the Israeli security company at the airports which could have stopped the flights from leaving.

Think about that one for a while.

Hours before the House version of the first Patriot Act went to a vote, "technical corrections" were inserted into the body of the legislation whereby foreign security companies such as ICTS-International would be immune from lawsuits related to the events of 9/11. Talk about not being available for deposition! This "Patriot" act legislative sleight of hand occurred before the inception of the 9/11 Commission when Fearless Leader George W. Bush was still resisting the very IDEA of an investigation into 9/11. Hence, in the face of an institutional cover-up, citizens were denied the possibility of a discovery process which is normally afforded to litigants. Without such discovery process, ICTS-International would never be compelled by a court of law to give testimony and show evidence related to the missing airport video surveillance tapes of 9/11 or any other aspect of security measures in place on 9/11. [rense.com]
"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring.

"Investigators within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying ... is considered career suicide."

Carl Cameron, as quoted in The Spies Who Came In From The Art Sale

"While I agree with you, if I say anything about US geopolitical interests with Israel, I might as well clean off my desk."

Unnamed reporter as quoted in American Media Censorship and Israel

Bookmark with:

Deli.cio.us    Digg    reddit    Facebook    StumbleUpon    Newsvine
Comments
Add New Search
Edi2or   |2008-05-30 05:41:54
So you wanna know the truth? Mossad says you can't handle the truth.
rhodan   |2008-05-30 21:02:34
a private security company called ICTS, owned by an Israeli, Ezra Harel, and registered in the Netherlands


that seems to be a corporation rather than privately owned
http://www.icts-int.com/content.aspx?id=6
Others In   |2008-05-31 05:49:18
Ok, so you want to split hairs, fine, then look at the content and then comment dickhead. If you don't know of which you speak, the shut the f*** UP. yEAH we said it. We up, we down and we are gone
rhodan   |2008-05-31 17:57:36
others in
what's the point of making such aggressive post?
by pointing out it is a full blown corporation makes it only clear that "dangerous" companies can apparently exist in the Netherlands, which is the more worrying, as they are under regulation of the Government.

A privately owned company is not so much under supervision of the Government.

And it makes sense though since the Dutch Government is pro-USA as in ass lickers
others in   |2008-06-01 05:38:18
Well I don't know about the Netherlands. I can't speak for the Netherlands. The story was not from the Netherlands and it was not written from the Netherlands.

Perspective would dictate that public or private, the amount of money a company has in its lobby portfolio pretty much governs how much government oversight they receive.

I'm sure all the fine citizens of the Netherlands a glad that you are their spokesperson.
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.21 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

Last Updated ( Friday, 30 May 2008 17:25 )
 
Find a home for your political website on a European server with
Banner
Freedom of Speech is more than just words.

Latest Comments

We believe in aliens.
Banner
Welcome to the cafe.
NS13 Political News and Rumors, Powered by Joomla! and designed by SiteGround web hosting